CAIR is seeking skilled leaders and innovators to serve on its Board of Directors

The Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology (CAIR) is currently seeking interested individuals to serve on the Board of Directors for a two-year term commencing in June 2023. The deadline for submitting nominations is December 31st, 2022.

CAIR is committed to diversity, equity and inclusion and we encourage applications from candidates who reflect the diversity of the individuals and communities we serve.

Equity and diversity are essential to excellence. An open and diverse community fosters the inclusion of voices that have been marginalized. To address the CAIR’s commitment to equity, diversity and inclusivity, in recognition of the underrepresentation of members of historically and currently marginalized groups, preference will be given to applicants who self‐identify as one or more of any of the following: diversity of gender identity,2SLBGTQ+, Indigenous peoples, racialized persons, persons with disabilities.

About the CAIR Board

The Board currently consists of eleven (11) directors serving staggered two-year (2) terms, with an option to extend for a maximum of five (5) two-year (2) terms. Based upon the tenure of the existing directors, the Board anticipates requiring a minimum of two (2) new directors in 2023, one (1) new director in 2024, and two (2) new directors in 2025.

With over 20 years of history and tradition, serving over 700 members, CAIR brings together the vast majority of Interventional Radiologists as well as other professionals of the field and works with patient groups and other allies to help increase accessibility for Canadians to patient friendly, effective, minimally invasive, image guided treatments.

Our vision is to improve Canadians’ health and quality of life through minimally invasive, image guided therapy.

The CAIR Board provides strategic leadership and general direction, governance, creates internal policies and procedures, oversees the organization’s general performance, and ensures overall accountability.

Composition and terms

All CAIR board directors must be members of CAIR. The CAIR by-laws permit a maximum of eleven (11) directors; all directors must be in ethical and professional good standing with their respective regulatory body(ies) where applicable.

Board members who are elected at the May 2023 annual meeting will have a two-year (2) term.

Commitment and Meetings

The Board meets between three (3) to four (4) times a year via teleconference or video conference, for typically around two (2) hours. In addition to attendance and preparation for meetings, Directors are expected to participate in email and telephone dialogues on various matters that arise in between and as a result of meetings, as well as sit on committees as required. The board is expected to participate in the two (2) in-person board retreats that happen in February and November of each year.

Attendance at the CAIR’s Annual Scientific Meeting, as well as other CAIR organized events is strongly encouraged. The board members may be asked to represent the organization in meetings with other partners and stakeholders, local, national, and international (meetings with different levels of government, SIR, CIRSE, etc.).

Board Roles & Responsibilities

The role of the CAIR board is to:

• Establish the mission, goals, and policies of the organization.
• Develop a long‐range plan for the organization; define strategy and a time frame for achievement of goals.
• Ensure the long‐term financial stability and strength of the organization, develop, and maintain sources of income to provide for the continuing operation of the organization.
• Ensure the long‐term organizational stability and strength of the organization, bring into the organization individuals with the necessary abilities to lead and manage the organization in the future.
• Hire and develop the CEO/Executive Director to manage the operations of the organization.
• Exercise high level oversight of the executive director and the operations, approve annual budgets, review operating and financial results, audit for compliance with internal policies and external requirements, review performance against goals.

The responsibilities of the board are to:

• Be committed to the mission, goals, and policies of the organization.
• Perform the functions and work of the board to the best of one’s ability.
• Recommend others who could serve on the board or be of value to the organization in other capacities.
• Avoid any conflicts of interest and situations that would compromise the principles of the organization or lead to the perception of compromise.
• Be knowledgeable about the organization, the services it provides and the IR community in which it operates.

Compensation

Board of Directors shall serve without remuneration. No Director shall directly or indirectly receive any profit from occupying the position of Director. Directors may be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of their duties.

Process

All applications will be considered based on merit; however, preference will be given to candidates with a background in leadership and governance, prior experience on or working with a Board of Directors, financial or accounting experience, familiarity with revenue generation in non-profit structures and sound financial sustainability practices, programs, and activities development from a national association perspective.

To submit an expression of interest in CAIR’s Board of Directors, please email luciana.nechita@cairweb.ca, addressing it to the Nominating Committee, including your resume and a brief cover letter sharing why you are interested in joining CAIR’s Board of Directors, what skills, knowledge, and expertise you feel are most exciting to share and what serving the interventional radiology community means to you.

As part of the assessment and recommendation process, candidates may be invited to interviews with the Board Nominating Committee and may be asked to participate in reference checks.

The submission deadline for positions for the coming year is January 31st, 2023.

Interventional Radiologists

 University Medical Imaging Consultants (UMIC), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon

Permanent Full-Time Academic & Clinical Position

WHY WE ARE HIRING

UMIC has undergone significant recent expansion of services combined with some pending radiologist retirements. As such, we are recruiting with Interventional Radiology as an area of special need.

ABOUT OUR PRACTICE

UMIC is currently a group of 29 radiologists centered in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. We have a mixed academic, hospital and community practice. All our members are affiliated with the University of Saskatchewan and actively involved in teaching and supervising residents and medical students. Our mix of academic and clinical services allows us to have an academic mission combined with good remuneration. We have a large on-site presence at Royal University Hospital and Jim Pattison Children’s Hospital in Saskatoon. We also provide diagnostic radiology services for Battlefords Union Hospital (in North Battleford) and Lloydminster Hospital (in Lloydminster) through a mixture of remote and on-site services. We own and operate Saskatoon Medical Imaging, a community radiology practice providing mammography, ultrasound, and x-ray services at over 20 clinics centered in Saskatoon. We have also recently started providing outpatient MRI and CT services at National Medical Imaging in Saskatoon.

WHO SHOULD APPLY?

The preferred candidates will have strong clinical training in Interventional Radiology. Although working within the specialty is expected, candidates must also be able and willing to practice covering a wider range of general radiology. Candidates must be willing to work both in hospital and clinic settings. Ability to perform breast imaging (mammography and ultrasound) would be preferred.

Candidates must also have an interest in academic radiology with a focus on resident supervision/teaching. A desire to participate in research including resident research supervision would be preferred but is not essential.

Diagnostic services covered by our group include MRI (3.0T & 1.5T with subspecialty reading), CT, ultrasound, mammography, radiography, and fluoroscopy.

Interventional radiology is hospital based and includes vascular (trauma/GI bleed embolizations, vascular access, uterine artery fibroid/AVM/hemorrhage embolizations, TACE, IVC filters) and non-vascular (biliary and gallbladder drains, nephrostomy tubes and ureteric stents, PG/PGJ tube placements, image guided ablations, chest and abdominal drains, image guided biopsies). Areas of desired expansion include but are not limited to TIPS and TARE.

Full posting available here.

Image-guided pain management is kind of the elephant in the room with many VIRs in Canada – we don’t do a lot of this, as they are typically performed by anesthesiologists, surgeons in subspecialties, or MSK-imaging trained diagnostic radiologists. During fellowship, the only image-guided pain control procedures Coco and I recalled performing were celiac plexus ethanol ablations and observing the odd vertebroplasty through a leaded glass window. As VIR staff, we have come to realise that a majority of our chronic vascular and haemodialysis patients (over 50%) have had some form of image-guided interventions (most commonly cervical/lumbar facets and large joint injections) performed by non-radiology specialists. We decided to dig deeper into the world of image-guided pain management and came across nerve ablation for large joint pain (typically fracture or OA) in non-operative patients. We discovered an interventional radiologist in Atlanta, Georgia, Dr. Prologo, and decided to pick his brain about nerve ablation.

J. David Prologo, MD, is Associate Professor in the Department of Radiology at Emory University School of Medicine and Director of Interventional Radiology Services at Emory Johns Creek Hospital. Dr. Prologo is an interventional radiologist specializing in diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, obesity medicine, interventional pain management and bone tumor ablations.

Dr. Prologo received his MD from Ohio State University and completed  radiology residency at University Hospitals Case Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio. He then completed a fellowship in vascular and interventional radiology at Metrohealth Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio.

Dr. Prologo’s research has focused on the application of image guided techniques to the delivery of stem cell therapies, the treatment of cancer pain, and for obesity management. He is a recognized expert in ablative therapies and has pioneered several new procedures in the subspecialty including the cryoablation of nerves.

When we first learned about genicular nerve ablation, we thought to ourselves – how? RFA? Microwave? Cryo? Ethanol? Could you briefly describe your experience with this procedure and how you have seen it evolve in recent years? ​

The original fluoroscopically guided RFA procedure was largely driven by industry. Companies with RFA probes marketed to the public and then trained the interventionalists. Over time, research demonstrated quite a bit of variability in the nerve courses and suggested that we were missing a good amount of the time. As a result, we (IR) began (as we always do LOL) to improve on this by using ultrasound (better guidance) and/or cryo (larger ablation zones).

Other than using an (RFA) probe, would you consider other methods to be safe? For example, could etOH ablation be feasible or would damage to muscular branches be too risky?

​Alcohol in my opinion is too expensive and impossible to control in this setting. Cryoablation is less painful, more predictable, and covers more space – making it ideal.

Could this procedure be performed solely under US guidance?

Yes.

How are you referred patients?​

Primarily from ortho in patients who don’t qualify or don’t want knee replacement.

How do you select patients?

Painful osteoarthritic knee or failed knee replacement without contraindication.

How do you follow these patients?

At 3, 6, and 12 months. Usually between 12 and 18 months we will repeat.

How many treatments are typically required?

One treatment lasts 12-18 months. The best outcome would be if the patient used that window to exercise, lose weight, and get the TKR.

What is the most common complication you see?

Complications are quite rare.

How does this compare to genicular artery embolization (GAE)?

​Interesting question. GAE does attempt to attenuate the pathophysiology of the disease while (genicular nerve ablation) is purely pain relief. That said, GAE is a little more involved and risky.

How many times do people refer to genicular nerve ablation as geniculate nerve ablation? 

​They generally refer to IR. We then decide which procedure to perform.

How can an established VIR get trained in this procedure?

These patients are out there. I recommend primarily going straight to them by pitching a news story, engaging a media liaison, or straight marketing. Alternatively, one could educate the orthopaedic surgeons (as above) and/or primary care doctors about these non-surgical options. Last, I would try to provide as quick a service as possible for the referrers.

Select references:

A Review of Long-Term Pain Relief after Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis 

Is Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Safe? A Literature Review and Anatomical Study 

Can cooled RF ablation relieve post-knee replacement pain?

Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation May Relieve Chronic Pain after TKA

The Department of Radiology, McMaster University and the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hamilton Health Sciences are seeking a full-time radiologist for the Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre interventional program, for start date of July 2023. Academic rank will be commensurate with the candidate’s qualification and experience.

As a full time faculty member within the Department of Radiology, the successful candidate will promote clinical scholarship and have a strong commitment to excellence in teaching, mentorship and interest in research. The successful candidate will participate in teaching and supervision of residents within our highly rated Diagnostic Radiology Residency Program and will support and participate in teaching activities in the undergraduate medicine program and other relevant programs. Teaching and supervision of interventional fellows in our McMaster fellowship programs is required.

Applicants must be certified (or eligible for certification) by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada in Diagnostic Radiology (or equivalent) and hold (or be eligible for) an independent license in the Province of Ontario. Successful applicants must have completed specialty fellowship training interventional radiology. Full posting here.

CAIR Express – your Canadian Interventional Radiology newsletter at your fingertips. Feel free to pass it along to others in your network, and most importantly, enjoy the content that is developed with you in mind.

Dr. Virani grew up in the Greater Toronto Area and pursued undergraduate and graduate studies at Western University. He returned to Toronto for medical school before venturing out east for Diagnostic Radiology residency at Dalhousie University in Halifax. Dr. Virani has spent the last two years at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia completing IR training. He looks forward to returning home to Canada to spend time with family while enjoying some travelling. Dr. Virani will be starting locums around the country and his goal is to join a radiology practice with an IR group possessing an innovative spirit, looking to push the boundaries to improve patient care.

Why did you choose the USA for fellowship?

I always wished to experience some level of training in the United States, to see how things were like south of the border. I had opportunities to pursue this for medical school and residency, however for different reasons at the time, I chose to stay in Canada, and had wonderful training experiences in Toronto and Halifax. Therefore, I saw fellowship as my last chance to pursue training in the US.

What was the interview and decision process like?

Unlike Canada, fellowship training programs in the US still may participate in a match process for candidate selection. For radiology, IR, Neuro, MSK, and Breast fellowships participate in a match conducted by the National Residency Match Program. So, just when I thought I was finished with the high-anxiety provoking morning of “clicking a mouse button to determine my future”, I was not.

Similar to the Canadian Resident Matching Service process, I was required to submit the usual gauntlet of documents such as essays, CV, and reference letters to the central match database. Since I knew I wanted to at least keep the option of fellowship training in the US a possibility, I had completed the United States Medical Licensing Examinations (Steps 1 to 3) during my medical school and PGY-1 years. To this day I am not sure if Emory IR required these exams or not, but I knew I did not want these to be a defining obstacle to a great training experience.

I applied to at least 10 different IR programs across the US, coast to coast. I knew IR fellowship programs were competitive the year I applied but I did not realize just how competitive. I was granted an interview at only one US institution – Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.

I flew down for my scheduled interview not knowing what to expect. Immediately, I was blown away by the university and hospital campus infrastructure. My interview day consisted of meeting other candidates socially followed by a brief group meeting with the new program director – Dr. Bill Majdalany, who moved from the University of Michigan to Emory to begin as the program director. I then proceeded to complete four 1-on-1 interviews throughout the day with Emory IR faculty. Before I knew it, my interview day was complete and I was on a flight back to Halifax.

A few weeks later, while in Washington D.C. for the well-known AIRP (American Institute for Radiological Pathology) course, I received an email from Dr. Majdalany inquiring if I was attending the SIR (Society of Interventional Radiology) annual conference, which was only a few weeks away. I was not planning on attending SIR since I was already at AIRP and had several resident clinical duties waiting for me back at Dalhousie. However, I knew it may be in my best interest to have more face time with the Emory group, not to mention the director of the training program. I decided to fly to Austin, Texas to spend 2 days at the SIR conference, during which I had breakfast with Dr. Majdalany (possibly the most important breakfast in my life to date). I’ll leave the details of our conversation out, but needless to say during my flight back home I knew Emory was my destiny.

Several months later during the summer of 2019 I once again had to make that mouseclick – and of course the rest was history.

Why Emory?

Where do I begin? I think Emory is unique in being one of the few institutions across the country offering a near complete IR fellowship training experience. Being the largest hospital system within the state of Georgia, the majority of complex cases are filtered to Emory, and the catchment does not stop at the state border, as we treat patients from Florida, South Carolina, Alabama, and beyond, including far internationally. The strength of the IR fellowship begins with the department, which houses the largest number of IR faculty in the country, including several past SIR presidents, with training backgrounds literally coast to coast who are eager to teach. Emory is a leading transplant and oncology center, not to mention supports one of the busiest trauma hospitals in the nation. We also rotate through the Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta hospitals, having the privilege to learn innovative interventional radiology techniques and skills in a quaternary pediatric setting. However, I feel most importantly, Emory from day one of the fellowship, stresses the importance of clinical training in shaping a successful interventional radiologist. In the ever-changing field of IR, Emory emphasizes the consulting nature of the IR specialty, and teaches the fellow responsibility in managing the patient before, during, and after a procedure.

What was an average day as a fellow like?

My alarm would ring at 4:30 am. I would arrive at the hospital by 6:00 am. Depending on the hospital site I was rotating through, I may or may not be with additional fellows (a total of 7 of us spread across 5 hospital sites). We would round on the in-patient list and write daily progress notes. The day’s scheduled inpatient/outpatient list of procedures were worked up either the night prior or early in the morning. We would tend to any overnight pressing matters. Morning rounds begin between 7:00 to 7:30 am depending on the hospital site. During this time, the IR trainee discusses each case for the day with the attendings, detailing the procedural plan. Upon the completion of rounds, we would be ready for the day’s cases to commence, typically the first case starting at 8:00 am. The main Emory University Hospital (where a fellow would spend 6 months of the year) typically has 4 angio suites available (and an additional CT room for cross-sectional procedures). An IR trainee is allocated to each room and is responsible for such during the day. At the additional sites, where only a single senior IR trainee is scheduled, we would be responsible for the entire day of cases. Once the last case has been completed, the fellow dictates the day’s cases while managing any floor issues that accrued. At this time, next-day planning occurs, consisting of triaging and working up inpatient consults to be scheduled around tomorrow’s outpatient list. It would not be unusual at the beginning of the year for me to walk out of the hospital after 9:00 pm, as I wanted the next day to run smoother than the last. Thankfully, as the training program progressed, I became more efficient at my duties, allowing myself to end the day earlier, slightly.

Overnight/weekend call coverage definitely had the potential to be busy. Due to the numerous sites covered by Emory we split the city into North and South calls, with a senior trainee and attending assigned to each daily. As Chief Fellow during my second year, I was responsible for the call schedule, ensuring trainees did not exceed a 1 in 4 call burden. The South pool was definitely on average the busier of the two pools, covering both Grady (level 1 trauma) and Emory University Hospital (transplant and complex surgical and hepatobiliary center). It was not uncommon to be up most of the night performing trauma embolizations or treating emergent bleeding patients, however we had an accepting culture of appropriate trainee reprieve following demanding shifts.

What was your case load?

After two years I would have completed slightly under 3000 cases with graduated autonomy. There is such a wide variety of cases performed at Emory, including great variation in complexity. My more complex case involvement included Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt creation (commonly utilizing intracardiac echocardiography guidance for portal vein access), complex hepatobiliary interventions such as percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography with palliative stenting, cholangioscopy with lithotripsy and stone retrieval, complex organ and soft tissue thermal and chemical ablations, traumatic solid organ and pelvic embolizations, high volume liver-directed endovascular therapy including Y-90 radioembolizations, diagnostic and therapeutic lymphangiograms with embolizations, and complex venous reconstructions using intravascular ultrasound.

Emory’s strength in fellowship experience is the innovation in treating patients with complex diseases. For example, I have been involved in Emory’s early experience in endovascular arteriovenous fistula creation in patients requiring dialysis (we are now approaching 10 patients with endovascularly created fistulas). Additionally, Emory’s presence in pain and palliation has been second to none. In the hopes of curtailing the opioid epidemic, a consistent proportion of the training experience has been centered on pain interventions, including kyphoplasty (with thermal ablation of bone metastases), cryoneurolysis (with targets such as celiac plexus and pudendal nerves), and genicular nerve ablations for patients unable to undergo knee arthroplasty.

In what area, if anything, do you feel you were taught less?

I feel Emory has provided me with a very comprehensive fellowship experience, as highlighted above. However, following the trends across many American IR training centers, we are exposed to minimal aortoiliac and peripheral arterial disease cases, which is contrary to the Canadian fellowship experience to my knowledge. This disparity in training becomes revealed when searching for IR faculty positions in Canada. However, I would add that my imaging expertise and endovascular skills will allow me to get up to speed with these interventions. Emory has trained many fellows who have gone on to thrive in peripheral arterial disease practices. “Give a man a fishing pole” analogy comes to mind here.

What do you perceive as advantages and disadvantages of doing fellowship in the USA?

Before discussing the advantages and disadvantages between the two training environments, I feel a few things must be discussed. The first disparity coming to mind is the length of IR training between the US and Canada today. Due to the emergence of the IR residency training program in the US, there are now several routes to IR training. For example, a graduate from medical school can now be matched into an IR-Integrated residency program (internship + 5 years of IR training).  The first 4 years are identical to Diagnostic Radiology (DR) training—and the trainee can sit for the diagnostic radiology boards.  The final 2 years in this pathway are very IR heavy, including some non-IR training, commonly in the intensive care unit or in the surgical transplant service.

A second IR training route is to begin as a DR resident, then match into an Early Specialization in Interventional Radiology (ESIR) program. Here, the PGY-5 year of the DR program with the ESIR designation includes 7 months of IR including a month of non-IR.  These trainees can then match into the second year of a 2-year Independent IR residency.  The final year is completely dedicated to IR.  Both routes are 6-year training programs.

Now, the conventional route of completing a 5-year Diagnostic Radiology residency followed by an IR residency is still a possibility, however the dedicated IR component is 2 years (total of 7 years of post-graduate training). I must also mention, there is NO MORE “IR fellowship” in the US. The three IR streams are all referred to as residency training programs.

The year I began my IR training in 2020 was the inaugural year of the two-year independent residency class. Initially when I was applying and became aware of this, I was quite deterred by the required extra year of training compared to Canadian IR fellowships. However, today, I would have it no other way. It took me a few months to even feel acclimated to Emory’s numerous hospital sites – let alone to a very different healthcare climate overall. Most importantly, the extra year of case experience in a trainee role was truly invaluable. I was able to hone skills in both common (such as uterine fibroid embolizations) and more uncommon procedures (such as prostate artery embolization or even percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy tube placement). Therefore, all things considered, the extra year was definitely a bonus.

Secondarily, the 2-year IR residency program (not fellowship!) is advantageous for both academic and community career paths. For an academic path, the reasoning is fairly simple – two years of high-level clinical IR training in a very academic atmosphere sets the groundwork for academic IR success. However, I will also argue this pathway more so strengthens a candidate for community IR – where there may be a paucity of subspecialty services in one’s community hospital, where then the IR doctor can use their arsenal of knowledge and skills to improve patient care in multidisciplinary healthcare.

The disadvantages of an IR residency in the US are few in my opinion. The most difficult aspect was not seeing my family nearly as much as I wished during my training. Since the entirety of the fellowship occurred in the presence of COVID-19, especially the first year when case numbers were rising, it was not feasible nor practical to travel back home to Canada. Luckily, I was blessed with great co-fellows and attendings who made Emory feel like home.

I believe that secondary disadvantages, such as the lack of aortic and peripheral arterial disease training mentioned above, or even other procedural skills and knowledge that is emphasized in one country, or even institution, can be overcome with focused extra-training and mentoring. Basic guidewire and catheter skills along with diagnostic imaging expertise allows an IR doctor to succeed in unchartered territory. Mentors at Emory have emphasized to me not to overly-focus on a specific procedure, but to spend more time in understanding the disease process instead. The disease itself is far more likely to be around tomorrow compared to the treatment being offered today.

Are you planning on writing the Canadian VIR boards? Why or why not?

Yes, I am definitely planning on writing the Canadian IR boards. Similar to the American subspecialty IR examination, a standardized assessment of IR in Canada helps ensure those who practice within this field meet a standard competency of safety to best serve the patient.

“When I was a resident we didn’t have a resident and fellows section!” I heard the words come out of my mouth and immediately cringed because I sounded like an old dingbat. But it’s true, and I’m not even that old! (Or am I?) The CAIR Resident, Fellow, and Student Section (RFS) is in its third year and continues to grow in numbers. Dr. Alanna Supersad is the new Chair of the RFS, we wanted to get to know Alanna a bit better and figured our reader(s) may as well.

Dr. Supersad is currently a PGY-5 resident in diagnostic radiology at the University of Alberta.  She was born and raised in Edmonton, and after medical school at the University of Calgary is back in her hometown to complete residency. Alanna’s road to medicine started when she took a job as a technologist assistant in a CT department when she was 18, continuing to work there throughout undergrad.  Through this work she realized she enjoyed the hospital setting and loved patient care. After a science based undergraduate degree, a year spent teaching in Spain and half a nursing degree she decided medicine was a better fit for her and dropped out of nursing school to pursue her medical degree. I assumed her background in medical imaging may have inspired her to choose radiology, but it did not!  In fact when she started medicine she thought she did not want to be a radiologist.  Famous last words!  As she moved through her clinical rotations she slowly ruled out other specialties and came to her senses/to the realization that the medical imaging department is the backbone of the hospital and all the interesting cases at some point made their way through the department. As a radiology resident Alanna has so far enjoyed all of her rotations, but by day 2 of her IR rotation she was hooked and knew it was for her.  She liked the hands-on nature of the work but really enjoyed the team based approach, working alongside technologists and nurses to help the patient.  Dr. Richard Owen and Dr. Rahim Samji have been influential mentors to Alanna, allowing her to spend time with them in their IR clinic and encouraging her to pursue a career as an IR.

Prior to becoming the chair of the CAIR RFS, Alanna was active on the board of the CAR RFS and has a passion for leadership. Any medical student or resident who thinks they might be interested in IR is encouraged to join the CAIR RFS. The RFS organizes educational and networking events throughout the year and is focused on growing the network of medical trainees interested in IR through collaboration with other international organizations like SIR and CIRSE.

When asked if she has any advice for medical students or junior residents, Dr. Supersad encourages them to get involved, be passionate, and work hard but don’t lose sight of what is important outside of medicine.  In her spare time Alanna is active with soccer, basketball and travel and is hoping to explore Portugal next. When not working hard or seeing the world she spends time with her friends and family, who are mostly based in Alberta, as well as her partner, Ben, and her Woodle, Gatsby. If you don’t know what a Woodle is, google it and fall in love. You’re welcome 🙂

Dr. Jason Wong (left)/ Dr. Stefan Przybojewski (right) at CAIR’s Annual Scientific Meeting 2022 in Montreal – Jeopardy Session

After growing up and completing medical as well as radiology training in Cape Town, South Africa (population approximately 5 million), Dr. Stefan Przybojewski, felt it was getting a bit small and was looking for adventure.  His escape from small town living in Cape Town came in the form of Cranbrook, British Columbia, where he spent two years as a general radiologist.  Stefan had an interest for IR as a radiology resident in Cape Town, where they are given a significant amount more responsibility as trainees, like performing bronchial artery embolization solo on call. After two years in Cranbrook, and a better understanding of Canadian geography and population distribution, he successfully applied for an IR fellowship at the University of Calgary. And the rest, as they say, is history.  Dr. Przybojewski stayed on with EFW Radiology at the University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre after completing fellowship and has been on staff ever since.

Dr. Przybojewski has a diverse IR practice with a passion for palliative IR and interventional oncology. He is one of the organizers of the CAIR’s Grand Slams and Catastrophes course, is half of the dynamic duo behind the much loved Jeopardy session at the CAIR annual scientific meeting (along with his partner in radiology and in style, Dr. Jason Wong), and recently joined the Board of Directors of CAIR.  If you would like to hear more about Stefan, including such hard hitting topics as his baseball walk up song, what gauge needle he uses for freezing and his advice for trainees, grab a refreshing beverage of your choosing and watch the video below.

Left to right: Dr. Tara Graham (CAIR Board President), Tara Utley (Canon Medical’s VL Product Manager Canada), Luciana Nechita (CAIR Executive Director)

The Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and Canon Medical will focus on strengthening the interests of females in the practice of Interventional Radiology.

Our joint commitment was announced on Thursday, May 27 at the “Women in IR” Cocktail Reception this past annual scientific meeting. To illustrate this under-representation, read the article: Women in Interventional Radiology: Exploring the Gender Disparity in Canada.

This year’s event created a new opportunity and opened the door for more to join the conversation. The reception space was over capacity. Quite different as explained by Dr. Tara Graham, CAIR Board President when only four of her female colleagues gathered to discuss their challenges and success in past years. Tara Utley, Senior Product Manager – Vascular at Canon Medical Systems Canada was a previous IR Technologist, and expressed her passion to see females in this specialty flourish.  Through education, mentorship, and conversation this five-year program is on course to empower existing and future Women in Interventional Radiology.

Dr. Gilles Soulez MD, MSc, FSIR is a vascular and interventional radiologist at CHUM, University of Montréal. He completed his radiology residency in France at University Paris V in 1988 and completed a 2-year fellowship combined with a certification of the French College of Interventional Radiology. He completed a MSc in clinical research and epidemiology at University of Montreal in 2000 and obtained a clinical researcher scholarship from the FRQ-S from the Junior I to National Scientist award.

He is currently appointed as a Professor of Radiology at University of Montreal and was chairman of the Department of Radiology, Radiation-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine from 2012 to 2020. His research is dedicated to the advancement of vascular and interventional radiology in the field of aortic, peripheral arterial diseases and management of vascular anomalies. He is funded by the Canadian Fund of Innovation, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Natural Science and Engineering Research Council, Fonds de la Recherché en Santé du Québec (FRQ-S). He has published 210 peer-reviewed papers during his career (H index 45).

He has authored and co-authored nine patents and is very active in n technological transfer with leading companies in this field, such as, Siemens Medical and Cook Medical.